↓ Skip to main content

Cell Migration

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Wound-healing assay.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
817 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Wound-healing assay.
Book title
Cell Migration
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2004
DOI 10.1385/1-59259-860-9:023
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-382-4, 978-1-59259-860-1
Authors

Rodriguez LG, Wu X, Guan JL, Rodriguez, Luis G., Wu, Xiaoyang, Guan, Jun-Lin

Abstract

The wound-healing assay is simple, inexpensive, and one of the earliest developed methods to study directional cell migration in vitro. This method mimics cell migration during wound healing in vivo. The basic steps involve creating a "wound" in a cell monolayer, capturing the images at the beginning and at regular intervals during cell migration to close the wound, and comparing the images to quantify the migration rate of the cells. It is particularly suitable for studies on the effects of cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions on cell migration. A variation of this method that tracks the migration of individual cells in the leading edge of the wound is also described in this chapter.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 817 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 794 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 181 22%
Student > Bachelor 124 15%
Student > Master 98 12%
Researcher 92 11%
Student > Postgraduate 38 5%
Other 94 12%
Unknown 190 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 185 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 182 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 36 4%
Chemistry 33 4%
Other 100 12%
Unknown 221 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,242,711
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,203
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,380
of 140,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.