You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Conformant Planning as a Case Study of Incremental QBF Solving
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 11 |
| Book title |
Artificial Intelligence and Symbolic Computation
|
| Published in |
arXiv, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-13770-4_11 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-913769-8, 978-3-31-913770-4
|
| Authors |
Uwe Egly, Martin Kronegger, Florian Lonsing, Andreas Pfandler, Egly, Uwe, Kronegger, Martin, Lonsing, Florian, Pfandler, Andreas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,721,395
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#438,970
of 933,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,141
of 226,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#2,480
of 9,587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 933,977 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9,587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.