↓ Skip to main content

Crossroads between Innate and Adaptive Immunity III

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: KIR/HLA: Genetic Clues for a Role of NK Cells in the Control of HIV.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
KIR/HLA: Genetic Clues for a Role of NK Cells in the Control of HIV.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Crossroads between Innate and Adaptive Immunity III
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-5632-3_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4419-5631-6, 978-1-4419-5632-3
Authors

Fadda, Lena, Alter, Galit, Lena Fadda, Galit Alter

Abstract

Early events following HIV infections determine the course of disease progression. Mounting evidence suggests that antiviral immune responses induced soon after infection, prior to the induction of adaptive immune responses, are key to early control of viral infection. Among the early innate immune effector cells, natural killer (NK) cells represent a unique subset of lymphoctyes that do not express an antigen specific receptor. Rather, these cells integrate signals from an arsenal of non-specific inhibitory and activating receptors that are expressed on their cell surface. As such, these cells are classified as cells of the innate immune system, and they are able to lyse certain tumor targets and infected cells without the need for prior antigen sensitization. Over the past decade, accumulating evidence suggests that these innate lymphocytes may not be as innate as once believed, but that individual NK cell clones may show some target cell specificity, and play a critical early role following infection with HIV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 13%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2011.
All research outputs
#18,293,967
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,273
of 4,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,881
of 244,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#92
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.