↓ Skip to main content

Biotechnology of Hairy Root Systems

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 181: Hairy Root Culture: Bioreactor Design and Process Intensification.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hairy Root Culture: Bioreactor Design and Process Intensification.
Chapter number 181
Book title
Biotechnology of Hairy Root Systems
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/10_2013_181
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-239018-0, 978-3-64-239019-7
Authors

Stiles AR, Liu CZ, Amanda R. Stiles, Chun-Zhao Liu

Abstract

The cultivation of hairy roots for the production of secondary metabolites offers numerous advantages; hairy roots have a fast growth rate, are genetically stable, and are relatively simple to maintain in phytohormone free media. Hairy roots provide a continuous source of secondary metabolites, and are useful for the production of chemicals for pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food additives. In order for hairy roots to be utilized on a commercial scale, it is necessary to scale-up their production. Over the last several decades, significant research has been conducted on the cultivation of hairy roots in various types of bioreactor systems. In this review, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various bioreactor systems, the major factors related to large-scale bioreactor cultures, process intensification technologies and overview the mathematical models and computer-aided methods that have been utilized for bioreactor design and development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Algeria 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 23%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Engineering 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,229,658
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#180
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,301
of 197,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.