↓ Skip to main content

The Inflammasome

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'The Inflammasome'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Assessing β-Amyloid-Induced NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in Primary Microglia
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Activating the NLRP3 Inflammasome Using the Amyloidogenic Peptide IAPP
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Assessment and Quantification of Crystal-Induced Lysosomal Damage
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Assessment of Inflammasome Activation in Primary Human Immune Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Cytotoxicity Induced by Particulate Adjuvants
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Measuring Inflammasome Activation in Response to Bacterial Infection
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Detection of Pyroptosis by Measuring Released Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 ASC Speck Formation as a Readout for Inflammasome Activation
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Immunoblotting for Active Caspase-1
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Inflammasome Activation and Inhibition in Primary Murine Bone Marrow-Derived Cells, and Assays for IL-1α, IL-1β, and Caspase-1
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Reconstituting the NLRP1 Inflammasome In Vitro
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Assessing ATP Binding and Hydrolysis by NLR Proteins
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Blue Native Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis to Monitor Inflammasome Assembly and Composition
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Analysis of Microbiota Alterations in Inflammasome-Deficient Mice
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Quantification of Adipose Tissue Leukocytosis in Obesity
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 In Vivo Evaluation of Neutrophil Recruitment in Response to Sterile Particulates
Attention for Chapter 5: NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Cytotoxicity Induced by Particulate Adjuvants
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Cytotoxicity Induced by Particulate Adjuvants
Chapter number 5
Book title
The Inflammasome
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-523-1_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-522-4, 978-1-62703-523-1
Authors

Marie Yang, Claire H. A. Hearnden, Ewa Oleszycka, Ed C. Lavelle

Abstract

The ability of particulate materials to provoke inflammatory immune responses has been well documented. In the case of endogenous and environmental particulates, these effects can often lead to pathological disorders. In contrast, particulate adjuvants incorporated into vaccines promote immune responses, which in turn provide efficient protection against infectious diseases. In recent years, studies have revealed that the NLRP3 inflammasome plays a key role in particulate-driven inflammation and its associated cytotoxicity. Hence, this chapter covers protocols useful to (1) assess NLRP3 inflammasome activation triggered by particulate adjuvants or materials in mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cell (BMDCs) differentiated cultures, and (2) measure particle-induced cytotoxicity. More specifically, protocols are described for the preparation and differentiation of BMDCs, their priming and stimulation using particulate NLRP3 agonists such as monosodium urate monohydrate (MSU) and the vaccine adjuvant alum. We then detail protocols to assess particulate-driven cytotoxicity via flow cytometry using annexin V-propidium iodide (PI) and novel dye LIVE/DEAD(®) aqua stain. General considerations are provided that warn against the use of endotoxin-contaminated particles and emphasize the use of experimental controls. Suggestions are also outlined for further assessment of the immunomodulatory effects of particulate materials in vivo using the mouse peritonitis model.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 27 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 40%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,229,658
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,863
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,900
of 280,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#298
of 340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.