↓ Skip to main content

MACPF/CDC Proteins - Agents of Defence, Attack and Invasion

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: The Role of MACPF Proteins in the Biology of Malaria and Other Apicomplexan Parasites.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Role of MACPF Proteins in the Biology of Malaria and Other Apicomplexan Parasites.
Chapter number 12
Book title
MACPF/CDC Proteins - Agents of Defence, Attack and Invasion
Published in
Sub cellular biochemistry, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-8881-6_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-178880-9, 978-9-40-178881-6
Authors

Joana Tavares, Rogerio Amino, Robert Ménard, Tavares, Joana, Amino, Rogerio, Ménard, Robert

Abstract

Apicomplexans are eukaryotic parasites of major medical and veterinary importance. They have complex life cycles through frequently more than one host, interact with many cell types in their hosts, and can breach host cell membranes during parasite traversal of, or egress from, host cells. Some of these parasites make a strikingly heavy use of the pore-forming MACPF domain, and encode up to 10 different MACPF domain-containing proteins. In this chapter, we focus on the two most studied and medically important apicomplexans, Plasmodium and Toxoplasma, and describe the known functions of their MACPF polypeptide arsenal. Apicomplexan MACPF proteins appear to be involved in a variety of membrane-damaging events, making them an attractive model to dissect the structure-function relationships of the MACPF domain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 36%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Computer Science 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,430,269
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from Sub cellular biochemistry
#63
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,541
of 320,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sub cellular biochemistry
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.