↓ Skip to main content

Biomedical Literature Mining

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 13: Role of Text Mining in Early Identification of Potential Drug Safety Issues.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Role of Text Mining in Early Identification of Potential Drug Safety Issues.
Chapter number 13
Book title
Biomedical Literature Mining
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0709-0_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0708-3, 978-1-4939-0709-0
Authors

Mei Liu, Yong Hu, Buzhou Tang, Liu M, Hu Y, Tang B, Liu, Mei, Hu, Yong, Tang, Buzhou

Abstract

Drugs are an important part of today's medicine, designed to treat, control, and prevent diseases; however, besides their therapeutic effects, drugs may also cause adverse effects that range from cosmetic to severe morbidity and mortality. To identify these potential drug safety issues early, surveillance must be conducted for each drug throughout its life cycle, from drug development to different phases of clinical trials, and continued after market approval. A major aim of pharmacovigilance is to identify the potential drug-event associations that may be novel in nature, severity, and/or frequency. Currently, the state-of-the-art approach for signal detection is through automated procedures by analyzing vast quantities of data for clinical knowledge. There exists a variety of resources for the task, and many of them are textual data that require text analytics and natural language processing to derive high-quality information. This chapter focuses on the utilization of text mining techniques in identifying potential safety issues of drugs from textual sources such as biomedical literature, consumer posts in social media, and narrative electronic medical records.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 27%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Librarian 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Computer Science 9 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Psychology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,959
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,865
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,360
of 305,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#294
of 597 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 597 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.