You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Comparison of Heart Rate Variability from PPG with That from ECG
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 54 |
| Book title |
The International Conference on Health Informatics
|
| Published in |
IFMBE proceedings, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-03005-0_54 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-903004-3, 978-3-31-903005-0
|
| Authors |
Wan-Hua Lin, Dan Wu, Chunyue Li, Heye Zhang, Yuan-Ting Zhang, Lin, Wan-Hua, Wu, Dan, Li, Chunyue, Zhang, Heye, Zhang, Yuan-Ting |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 33% |
| South Africa | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 27 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,209,156
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from IFMBE proceedings
#14
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,035
of 406,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IFMBE proceedings
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.