You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Analysis of diterpenes and triterpenes from plant foliage and roots.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 10 |
| Book title |
Plant Isoprenoids
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-0606-2_10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-0605-5, 978-1-4939-0606-2
|
| Authors |
Qiang Wang, Reza Sohrabi, Dorothea Tholl, Wang, Qiang, Sohrabi, Reza, Tholl, Dorothea |
| Abstract |
Terpene specialized metabolites exhibit multiple functions in plant-environment interactions and plant development. Molecular biologists investigating the biochemistry and molecular function of terpenes need to apply robust but yet sensitive analytical methods optimized and adapted to the structural diversity and often varying concentrations of terpene compounds in plant tissues. Here we present hands-on protocols for sample preparation and GC-MS or LC-MS/MS analysis of selected diterpene and triterpene hydrocarbons or oxygenated derivatives from roots and shoots of Arabidopsis and rice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,228,822
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,863
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,780
of 305,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#405
of 597 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 597 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.