↓ Skip to main content

Glial Cells in Health and Disease of the CNS

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Glial Cells in Health and Disease of the CNS'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Glial Cells and Integrity of the Nervous System
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 NG2-glia, More Than Progenitor Cells
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Pharmacological Tools to Study the Role of Astrocytes in Neural Network Functions
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Microglia Function in the Normal Brain
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Physiological Functions of Glial Cell Hemichannels
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Role of Astrocytes in Central Respiratory Chemoreception
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Purine Signaling and Microglial Wrapping
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Oligodendrocytes: Functioning in a Delicate Balance Between High Metabolic Requirements and Oxidative Damage
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Schwann Cell and Axon: An Interlaced Unit—From Action Potential to Phenotype Expression
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Glial Cells in Health and Disease of the CNS
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Astrocyte Dysfunction in Developmental Neurometabolic Diseases
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Microglia in Cancer: For Good or for Bad?
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Peripheral Inflammation and Demyelinating Diseases
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Regulation of Oligodendrocyte Differentiation and Myelination by Nuclear Receptors: Role in Neurodegenerative Disorders
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Role of Galectin-3: From Oligodendroglial Differentiation and Myelination to Demyelination and Remyelination Processes in a Cuprizone-Induced Demyelination Model
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Prenatal Systemic Hypoxia-Ischemia and Oligodendroglia Loss in Cerebellum
Attention for Chapter 12: Microglia in Cancer: For Good or for Bad?
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Microglia in Cancer: For Good or for Bad?
Chapter number 12
Book title
Glial Cells in Health and Disease of the CNS
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-40764-7_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-940762-3, 978-3-31-940764-7
Authors

Anna Carolina Carvalho da Fonseca, Rackele Amaral, Celina Garcia, Luiz Henrique Geraldo, Diana Matias, Flavia Regina Souza Lima, da Fonseca, Anna Carolina Carvalho, Amaral, Rackele, Garcia, Celina, Geraldo, Luiz Henrique, Matias, Diana, Lima, Flavia Regina Souza

Abstract

Glioblastoma is a malignant tumor of astrocytic origin that is highly invasive, proliferative and angiogenic. Despite current advances in multimodal therapies, such as surgery, radio- and chemotherapy, the outcome for patients with glioblastoma is nearly always fatal. The glioblastoma microenvironment has a tremendous influence over the tumor growth and spread. Microglia and macrophages are abundant cells in the tumor mass. Increasing evidence indicates that glioblastoma recruits these cell populations and signals in a way that microglia and macrophages are subverted to promote tumor progression. In this chapter, we discuss some aspects of the interaction between microglia and glioblastoma, consequences of this interaction for tumor progression and the possibility of microglial cells being used as therapeutic vectors, which opens up new alternatives for the development of GBM therapies targeting microglia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 30%
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 24%
Neuroscience 10 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,230
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,720
of 394,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#125
of 444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.