↓ Skip to main content

Language Differences as a Barrier to Quality and Safety in Health Care: The Joint Commission Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Language Differences as a Barrier to Quality and Safety in Health Care: The Joint Commission Perspective
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11606-007-0365-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul M. Schyve

Abstract

Effective communication with patients is critical to the safety and quality of care. Barriers to this communication include differences in language, cultural differences, and low health literacy. Evidence-based practices that reduce these barriers must be integrated into, rather than just added to, health care work processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Unknown 360 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 21%
Student > Bachelor 66 18%
Researcher 31 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Other 68 19%
Unknown 71 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 17%
Social Sciences 43 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 4%
Computer Science 10 3%
Other 57 16%
Unknown 83 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,839,426
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,991
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,994
of 78,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#20
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.