↓ Skip to main content

Membrane Proteins

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Analyzing the Effects of Hydrophobic Mismatch on Transmembrane α-Helices Using Tryptophan Fluorescence Spectroscopy.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Analyzing the Effects of Hydrophobic Mismatch on Transmembrane α-Helices Using Tryptophan Fluorescence Spectroscopy.
Chapter number 5
Book title
Membrane Proteins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-583-5_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-582-8, 978-1-62703-583-5
Authors

Caputo GA, Gregory A. Caputo

Abstract

Hydrophobic matching between transmembrane protein segments and the lipid bilayer in which they are embedded is a significant factor in the behavior and orientation of such transmembrane segments. The condition of hydrophobic mismatch occurs when the hydrophobic thickness of a lipid bilayer is significantly different than the length of the membrane spanning segment of a protein, resulting in a mismatch. This mismatch can result in altered function of proteins as well as nonnative structural arrangements including effects on transmembrane α-helix tilt angles, oligomerization state, and/or the formation of non-transmembrane topographies. Here, a fluorescence-based protocol is described for testing model transmembrane α-helices and their sensitivity to hydrophobic mismatch by measuring the propensity of these helices to form non-transmembrane structures. Overall, good hydrophobic matching between the bilayer and transmembrane segments is an important factor that must be considered when designing membrane proteins or peptides.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Chemistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,226,756
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,859
of 13,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,533
of 200,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#46
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.