You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The Special Case of VV Cephei
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 3 |
| Book title |
Giants of Eclipse: The ζ Aurigae Stars and Other Binary Systems
|
| Published in |
ADS, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-09198-3_3 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-909197-6, 978-3-31-909198-3
|
| Authors |
Philip D. Bennett, Wendy Hagen Bauer, Bennett, Philip D., Bauer, Wendy Hagen |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,534,941
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,302
of 37,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,430
of 354,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#121
of 488 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 488 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.