↓ Skip to main content

Cosmic Gamma-Ray Sources

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: Diffuse Gamma Rays
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Diffuse Gamma Rays
Chapter number 12
Book title
Cosmic Gamma-Ray Sources
Published in
arXiv, January 2004
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-2256-2_12
Book ISBNs
978-9-04-816625-1, 978-1-4020-2256-2
Authors

I. V. Moskalenko, A. W. Strong, O. Reimer, Moskalenko, Igor V., Strong, Andrew W., Reimer, Olaf

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2014.
All research outputs
#5,870,291
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#122,688
of 933,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,169
of 133,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#48
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 933,967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.