↓ Skip to main content

Advances in Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Public Health

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Advances in Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Public Health'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Quorum Quenching Strategy Targeting Gram-Positive Pathogenic Bacteria
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5011 Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of 19 essential oils.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5012 Advances in Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Public Health: Refractory Trichophyton rubrum Infections in Turin, Italy: A Problem Still Present
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5013 Antioxidant Hydroxytyrosol-Based Polyacrylate with Antimicrobial and Antiadhesive Activity Versus Staphylococcus Epidermidis.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5014 The Role of Human Herpesvirus 8 in Diabetes Mellitus Type 2: State of the Art and a Medical Hypothesis
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5015 Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Based on Data Collected by a Network of Clinical Microbiology Laboratories, in Italy.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5016 β-Defensins: Work in Progress
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5017 Emergence of Escherichia coli Sequence Type 131 (ST131) and ST3948 with KPC-2, KPC-3 and KPC-8 carbapenemases from a Long-Term Care and Rehabilitation Facility (LTCRF) in Northern Italy
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5018 Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: Results of a Laboratory Surveillance Program in an Italian General Hospital (August 2014-January 2015) : Surveillance of Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5019 A Snapshot of Drug-Resistant M. tuberculosis Strains in Croatia
Attention for Chapter 5019: A Snapshot of Drug-Resistant M. tuberculosis Strains in Croatia
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Snapshot of Drug-Resistant M. tuberculosis Strains in Croatia
Chapter number 5019
Book title
Advances in Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Public Health
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/5584_2015_5019
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-927934-3, 978-3-31-927935-0
Authors

Ljiljana Zmak, Mihaela Obrovac, Vera Katalinic-Jankovic

Abstract

Tuberculosis caused by resistant M. tuberculosis strains poses a serious threat as it requires prolonged and costly treatment and has high mortality rate. In order to investigate resistance to antituberculous drugs in Croatia, we analysed all resistant M. tuberculosis strains isolated from patients' samples in period 2010-2014 (1 strain per patient). Out of 2384 M. tuberculosis strains, we identified 88 (3.69 %) resistant strains. The analysis included resistance patterns, resistance conferring mutations and, according to MIRU-VNTR analysis, clustering and global lineages distribution. Relatively high number of strains was monoresistant, especially to isoniazid, while there were only six multiresistant strains. Among 59 strains with any pattern that includes resistance to isoniazid, a total of 22 (37.29 %) had resistance conferring mutation in katG gene (S315T), 23 (38.98 %) in inhA promoter region (C-15T) and 14 (23.73 %) had none of these mutations. The observed clustering rate of resistant strains was 28.41 %, and the most common global lineage was Euro-American (75 %).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 41%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,352,337
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,104
of 4,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,133
of 354,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#91
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.