You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Improved Absolute Approximation Ratios for Two-Dimensional Packing Problems
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 14 |
Book title |
Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques
|
Published in |
ADS, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-03685-9_14 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-203684-2, 978-3-64-203685-9
|
Authors |
Rolf Harren, Rob van Stee, Harren, Rolf, van Stee, Rob |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 67% |
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 67% |
Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,128,555
of 24,380,741 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,674
of 39,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,406
of 177,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#318
of 906 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,380,741 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 906 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.