↓ Skip to main content

Plant Epigenetics and Epigenomics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Plant Epigenetics and Epigenomics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Landscaping Plant Epigenetics
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Gene Balance Hypothesis: Dosage Effects in Plants
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 High-Throughput RNA-Seq for Allelic or Locus-Specific Expression Analysis in Arabidopsis -Related Species, Hybrids, and Allotetraploids
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Inference of Allele-Specific Expression from RNA-seq Data.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Screening for Imprinted Genes Using High-Resolution Melting Analysis of PCR Amplicons
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Analysis of Genomic Imprinting by Quantitative Allele-Specific Expression by Pyrosequencing ®
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Endosperm-Specific Chromatin Profiling by Fluorescence-Activated Nuclei Sorting and Chip-on-Chip
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Imaging Sexual Reproduction in Arabidopsis Using Fluorescent Markers
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Plant Epigenetics and Epigenomics
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Methylation-Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) Marker to Investigate Drought-Stress Response in Montepulciano and Sangiovese Grape Cultivars
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Detecting Histone Modifications in Plants
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Quantitatively Profiling Genome-Wide Patterns of Histone Modifications in Arabidopsis thaliana Using ChIP-seq
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Analysis of retrotransposon activity in plants.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Detecting Epigenetic Effects of Transposable Elements in Plants
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Detection and Investigation of Transitive Gene Silencing in Plants
Attention for Chapter 4: Inference of Allele-Specific Expression from RNA-seq Data.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Inference of Allele-Specific Expression from RNA-seq Data.
Chapter number 4
Book title
Plant Epigenetics and Epigenomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-773-0_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-772-3, 978-1-62703-773-0
Authors

Paul K. Korir, Cathal Seoighe, Korir, Paul K., Seoighe, Cathal

Abstract

The differential abundance of transcripts from alternative alleles of a gene, for example in a hybrid plant or an outbred natural population, can provide information about the nature of interindividual or interstrain variation in gene expression. Allele-specific expression (ASE) can result from epigenetic phenomena, such as imprinting (when the overexpressed allele is inherited consistently from one parent) or allele-specific chromatin modifications. Alternatively, DNA sequence variants in the promoter or within the transcribed region of a gene can affect the rate of transcription or the rate of decay of the transcript, respectively. The existence of this allelic variation and the insights it provides into the nature of the gene regulation are of significant interest. With the recent widespread availability of sequencing based transcriptomics, the power to detect ASE has increased; however, inference of ASE from transcriptome sequencing data is subject to several caveats and potential biases and the results need to be interpreted with care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 34%
Researcher 8 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 22%
Computer Science 4 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,110,763
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,811
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,106
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#80
of 597 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 597 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.