↓ Skip to main content

Bone Marrow and Stem Cell Transplantation

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Bone Marrow and Stem Cell Transplantation'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Reporter Gene Technologies for Imaging Cell Fates in Hematopoiesis
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Flow cytometry for hematopoietic cells.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isolation and Characterization of Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Methods for Functional Analysis of Stem Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 An Overview of HLA Typing for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 HLA Typing with Sequence-Specific Oligonucleotide Primed PCR (PCR-SSO) and Use of the Luminex™ Technology
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Sequence-Based Typing of HLA: An Improved Group-Specific Full-Length Gene Sequencing Approach
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Molecular Typing Methods for Minor Histocompatibility Antigens
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Natural Killer Cells and Killer-Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor Polymorphisms: Their Role in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Methods of Detection of Immune Reconstitution and T Regulatory Cells by Flow Cytometry
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Molecular Methods Used for Detection of Minimal Residual Disease Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Myeloid Disorders
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Molecular Methods for Detection of Minimal Residual Disease Following Transplantation in Lymphoid and Plasma Cell Disorders
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Molecular Methods for Detection of Invasive Fungal Infections and Mycobacteria and Their Clinical Significance in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Post-transplant Monitoring of Chimerism by Lineage-Specific Analysis
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Urinary Proteomics Employing Capillary Electrophoresis Coupled to Mass Spectrometry in the Monitoring of Patients After Stem Cell Transplantation
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 ERRATUM
Attention for Chapter 7: Sequence-Based Typing of HLA: An Improved Group-Specific Full-Length Gene Sequencing Approach
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Sequence-Based Typing of HLA: An Improved Group-Specific Full-Length Gene Sequencing Approach
Chapter number 7
Book title
Bone Marrow and Stem Cell Transplantation
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-9437-9_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-9436-2, 978-1-4614-9437-9
Authors

Christina E. M. Voorter, Fausto Palusci, Marcel G. J. Tilanus

Editors

Meral Beksaç

Abstract

Matching for HLA at the allele level is crucial for stem cell transplantation. The golden standard approach for allele definition of full gene polymorphism, the so-called high-resolution HLA typing, is sequence-based typing (SBT). Although the majority of the polymorphism for class I is located in exons 2 and 3 and for class II in exon 2, for allele definition it is necessary to unravel the complete coding and intron sequences leading to an ultrahigh HLA typing resolution at the allele level, i.e., a full-length gene polymorphism identification.This chapter describes our recently developed SBT method for HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DQB1, that is based on full-length hemizygous Sanger sequencing of the alleles, separated by group-specific amplification using the low-resolution typing result as reference starting point. Group-specific amplification has already been established for DRB. This method enables a cost-efficient, user-friendly SBT approach resulting in a timely unambiguous HLA typing to an ultrahigh resolution level with minimal hands-on time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Student > Bachelor 4 24%
Other 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,293,290
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,313
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,021
of 306,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#199
of 593 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 593 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.