You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Nanoclustering and Heterogeneous Membrane Diffusion of Ras Studied by FRAP and RICS Analysis.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 20 |
Book title |
Ras Signaling
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-791-4_20 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-790-7, 978-1-62703-791-4
|
Authors |
Camilo Guzmán, Maja Solman, Daniel Abankwa, Maja Šolman, Guzmán, Camilo, Šolman, Maja, Abankwa, Daniel |
Abstract |
Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) and Raster Image Correlation Spectroscopy (RICS) are two powerful techniques to study the diffusion dynamics of fluorescently labeled proteins. FRAP and RICS can be easily applied on any commercial confocal microscope. In this chapter, we describe the principles of these methods and provide the reader with a detailed guide on how to apply these methods in the study of Ras nanoclustering and diffusion in the plasma membrane of live cells. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hungary | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 36% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 64% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,361,534
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,860
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,330
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#293
of 596 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 596 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.