↓ Skip to main content

Methods for Assessing the Credibility of Clinical Trial Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods for Assessing the Credibility of Clinical Trial Outcomes
Published in
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, December 2001
DOI 10.1177/009286150103500442
Authors

Robert A. J. Matthews

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 7 27%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Mathematics 4 15%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
#572
of 861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,167
of 130,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.