↓ Skip to main content

Blended learning in health education: three case studies

Overview of attention for article published in Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blended learning in health education: three case studies
Published in
Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40037-014-0108-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nynke de Jong, Maggi Savin-Baden, Anne Marie Cunningham, Daniëlle M. L. Verstegen

Abstract

Blended learning in which online education is combined with face-to-face education is especially useful for (future) health care professionals who need to keep up-to-date. Blended learning can make learning more efficient, for instance by removing barriers of time and distance. In the past distance-based learning activities have often been associated with traditional delivery-based methods, individual learning and limited contact. The central question in this paper is: can blended learning be active and collaborative? Three cases of blended, active and collaborative learning are presented. In case 1 a virtual classroom is used to realize online problem-based learning (PBL). In case 2 PBL cases are presented in Second Life, a 3D immersive virtual world. In case 3 discussion forums, blogs and wikis were used. In all cases face-to-face meetings were also organized. Evaluation results of the three cases clearly show that active, collaborative learning at a distance is possible. Blended learning enables the use of novel instructional methods and student-centred education. The three cases employ different educational methods, thus illustrating diverse possibilities and a variety of learning activities in blended learning. Interaction and communication rules, the role of the teacher, careful selection of collaboration tools and technical preparation should be considered when designing and implementing blended learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 146 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Lecturer 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 22%
Social Sciences 24 15%
Computer Science 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 44 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,488,484
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#57
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,532
of 321,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.