↓ Skip to main content

Euglena: Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: C2 metabolism in Euglena
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
C2 metabolism in Euglena
Chapter number 3
Book title
Euglena: Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-54910-1_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-954908-8, 978-3-31-954910-1
Authors

Masami Nakazawa, Nakazawa, Masami

Editors

Steven D. Schwartzbach, Shigeru Shigeoka

Abstract

Euglenoids are able to assimilate fatty acids and alcohols with various carbon-chain lengths, and ethanol is known to be one of the best carbon sources to support the growth of Euglena gracilis. Ethanol is first oxidized to acetate by the sequential reactions of alcohol dehydrogenase and acetaldehyde dehydrogenase in the mitochondria, and then converted to acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA). Acetyl-CoA is metabolized through the glyoxylate cycle which is a modified tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in which isocitrate lyase (ICL) and malate synthase (MS) function to bypass the two decarboxylation steps of the TCA cycle, enabling the net synthesis of carbohydrates from C2 compounds. ICL and MS form a unique bifunctional enzyme localized in Euglena mitochondria, not in glyoxysome as in other eukaryotes. The unique glyoxylate and glycolate metabolism during photorespiration is also discussed in this chapter.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 20%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,230
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,572
of 421,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#117
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.