↓ Skip to main content

Viruses and Nanotechnology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Biomedical nanotechnology using virus-based nanoparticles.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Biomedical nanotechnology using virus-based nanoparticles.
Chapter number 5
Book title
Viruses and Nanotechnology
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-69379-6_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-069376-5, 978-3-54-069379-6
Authors

G Destito, A Schneemann, M Manchester, Destito, G., Schneemann, A., Manchester, M., G. Destito, A. Schneemann, M. Manchester

Abstract

A great challenge in biomedicine is the ability to target therapeutics to specific locations in the body in order to increase therapeutic benefit and minimize adverse effects. Virus-based nanotechnology takes advantage of the natural circulatory and targeting properties of viruses, in order to design therapeutics and vaccines that specifically target tissues of interest in vivo. Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) and flock house virus (FHV) nanoparticle-based strategies hold great promise for the design of targeted therapeutics, as well as for structure-based vaccine approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
Italy 1 5%
Singapore 1 5%
Unknown 17 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 48%
Chemistry 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,480,508
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#177
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,806
of 188,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.