↓ Skip to main content

Tumor microenvironment and cellular stress: signaling, metabolism, imaging, and therapeutic targets. Preface.

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: miR-210: Fine-Tuning the Hypoxic Response.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
miR-210: Fine-Tuning the Hypoxic Response.
Chapter number 10
Book title
Tumor Microenvironment and Cellular Stress
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-5915-6_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-5914-9, 978-1-4614-5915-6
Authors

Mircea Ivan, Xin Huang, Ivan M, Huang X, Ivan, Mircea, Huang, Xin

Abstract

Hypoxia is a central component of the tumor microenvironment and represents a major source of therapeutic failure in cancer therapy. Recent work has provided a wealth of evidence that noncoding RNAs and, in particular, microRNAs, are significant members of the adaptive response to low oxygen in tumors. All published studies agree that miR-210 specifically is a robust target of hypoxia-inducible factors, and the induction of miR-210 is a consistent characteristic of the hypoxic response in normal and transformed cells. Overexpression of miR-210 is detected in most solid tumors and has been linked to adverse prognosis in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma, breast, head and neck, and pancreatic cancer. A wide variety of miR-210 targets have been identified, pointing to roles in the cell cycle, mitochondrial oxidative metabolism, angiogenesis, DNA damage response, and cell survival. Additional microRNAs seem to be modulated by low oxygen in a more tissue-specific fashion, adding another layer of complexity to the vast array of protein-coding genes regulated by hypoxia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 98 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Student > Bachelor 18 18%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 18%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,215,721
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,951
of 4,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,747
of 305,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#112
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.