↓ Skip to main content

Heterologous Protein Production in CHO Cells

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Heterologous Protein Production in CHO Cells'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Strategies and Considerations for Improving Expression of “Difficult to Express” Proteins in CHO Cells
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Glycoengineering of CHO Cells to Improve Product Quality
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Large-Scale Transient Transfection of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells in Suspension
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Cloning of Single-Chain Antibody Variants by Overlap-Extension PCR for Evaluation of Antibody Expression in Transient Gene Expression
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Anti-Apoptosis Engineering for Improved Protein Production from CHO Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Conditional Knockdown of Endogenous MicroRNAs in CHO Cells Using TET-ON-SanDI Sponge Vectors
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing to Improve Recombinant Protein Production in CHO Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Improved CHO Cell Line Stability and Recombinant Protein Expression During Long-Term Culture
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Selection of High-Producing Clones Using FACS for CHO Cell Line Development
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 The ‘Omics Revolution in CHO Biology: Roadmap to Improved CHO Productivity
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A Bioinformatics Pipeline for the Identification of CHO Cell Differential Gene Expression from RNA-Seq Data
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Filter-Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) for Improved Proteome Analysis of Recombinant Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Phosphopeptide Enrichment and LC-MS/MS Analysis to Study the Phosphoproteome of Recombinant Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Engineer Medium and Feed for Modulating N-Glycosylation of Recombinant Protein Production in CHO Cell Culture
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Glycosylation Analysis of Therapeutic Glycoproteins Produced in CHO Cells
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Characterization of Host Cell Proteins (HCPs) in CHO Cell Bioprocesses
Attention for Chapter 11: A Bioinformatics Pipeline for the Identification of CHO Cell Differential Gene Expression from RNA-Seq Data
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Bioinformatics Pipeline for the Identification of CHO Cell Differential Gene Expression from RNA-Seq Data
Chapter number 11
Book title
Heterologous Protein Production in CHO Cells
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6972-2_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6971-5, 978-1-4939-6972-2
Authors

Monger, Craig, Motheramgari, Krishna, McSharry, John, Barron, Niall, Clarke, Colin, Craig Monger, Krishna Motheramgari, John McSharry, Niall Barron, Colin Clarke

Editors

Paula Meleady

Abstract

In recent years, the publication of genome sequences for the Chinese hamster and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines has facilitated study of these biopharmaceutical cell factories with unprecedented resolution. Our understanding of the CHO cell transcriptome, in particular, has rapidly advanced through the application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to characterize RNA expression (RNA-Seq). In this chapter, we present a computational pipeline for the analysis of CHO cell RNA-Seq data from the Illumina platform to identify differentially expressed genes. The example data and bioinformatics workflow required to run this analysis are freely available at www.cgcdb.org/rnaseq_analysis_protocol.html .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,520,540
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#466
of 13,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,665
of 311,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#7
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.