You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The Relationship of Pellagra to Corn and the Low Availability of Niacin in Cereals
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
Nutritional Adequacy, Nutrient Availability and Needs
|
| Published in |
EXS, January 1983
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-0348-6540-1_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-486542-5, 978-3-03-486540-1
|
| Authors |
Kenneth J. Carpenter, Carpenter, Kenneth J. |
| Editors |
Prof. J. Mauron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,762,554
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from EXS
#9
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371
of 33,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EXS
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.