↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Management of Pulmonary Disorders and Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 38: Mortality Due to Nosocomial Infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae ESBL+
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Mortality Due to Nosocomial Infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae ESBL+
Chapter number 38
Book title
Clinical Management of Pulmonary Disorders and Diseases
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_38
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-969544-0, 978-3-31-969545-7
Authors

Starzyk-Łuszcz, Katarzyna, Zielonka, Tadeusz M., Jakubik, Joanna, Życińska, Katarzyna, Katarzyna Starzyk-Łuszcz, Tadeusz M. Zielonka, Joanna Jakubik, Katarzyna Życińska

Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae is one of the most important hospital pathogens, particularly concerning the multidrug-resistant strain ESBL(+). The aim of this study was to evaluate nosocomial infections with K. pneumoniae ESBL(+) in the context of infection location, risk factors, and prognosis. This hospital study was conducted retrospectively and covered a 3 months' period. The infection with K. pneumoniae ESBL(+) was diagnosed in 36 patients (19 women and 17 men) of the mean age of 74.2 ± 14.8 years. The number of infected patients amounted to 2.2% of all patients admitted to Czerniakowski Hospital in Warsaw, Poland, over the study time. Twenty of these patients died (13 women and 7 men), representing 14% of all hospital deaths at the time. The infection with K. pneumoniae ESBL(+) occurred most frequently in the department of internal diseases, and rarely in neurology or intensive care wards. Bacteria was most often isolated from the urine, with the most distinct association between the use of urinary catheters and death (p = 0.019). We conclude that infections with K. pneumoniae ESBL(+) were associated with over 55% mortality and usually occurred in the setting of internal diseases. Deaths due to K. pneumoniae ESBL(+) infection were significantly related to the use of urinary bladder catheters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Unspecified 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 17%
Unspecified 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,546,002
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,322
of 4,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,113
of 310,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#86
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.