You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A New Method and Metric to Evaluate the Peer Review Process of Scholarly Journals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Publishing Research Quarterly, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12109-013-9339-y |
| Authors |
Adam Etkin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 12 | 23% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 23 | 43% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,875,538
of 24,416,081 outputs
Outputs from Publishing Research Quarterly
#68
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,393
of 317,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Publishing Research Quarterly
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,416,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.