↓ Skip to main content

Systems Analysis of Human Multigene Disorders

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Wellness and Health Omics Linked to the Environment: The WHOLE Approach to Personalized Medicine
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Wellness and Health Omics Linked to the Environment: The WHOLE Approach to Personalized Medicine
Chapter number 1
Book title
Systems Analysis of Human Multigene Disorders
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8778-4_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-8777-7, 978-1-4614-8778-4
Authors

Greg Gibson, Gibson, Greg

Abstract

The WHOLE approach to personalized medicine represents an effort to integrate clinical and genomic profiling jointly into preventative health care and the promotion of wellness. Our premise is that genotypes alone are insufficient to predict health outcomes, since they fail to account for individualized responses to the environment and life history. Instead, integrative genomic approaches incorporating whole genome sequences and transcriptome and epigenome profiles, all combined with extensive clinical data obtained at annual health evaluations, have the potential to provide more informative wellness classification. As with traditional medicine where the physician interprets subclinical signs in light of the person's health history, truly personalized medicine will be founded on algorithms that extract relevant information from genomes but will also require interpretation in light of the triggers, behaviors, and environment that are unique to each person. This chapter discusses some of the major obstacles to implementation, from development of risk scores through integration of diverse omic data types to presentation of results in a format that fosters development of personal health action plans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 30%
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Computer Science 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Psychology 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,315,316
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#995
of 4,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,247
of 400,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#92
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.