↓ Skip to main content

Systems Analysis of Human Multigene Disorders

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Characterizing Multi-omic Data in Systems Biology.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Characterizing Multi-omic Data in Systems Biology.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Systems Analysis of Human Multigene Disorders
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8778-4_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-8777-7, 978-1-4614-8778-4
Authors

Christopher E. Mason, Sandra G. Porter, Todd M. Smith, Mason CE, Porter SG, Smith TM

Abstract

In today's biology, studies have shifted to analyzing systems over discrete biochemical reactions and pathways. These studies depend on combining the results from scores of experimental methods that analyze DNA; mRNA; noncoding RNAs, DNA, RNA, and protein interactions; and the nucleotide modifications that form the epigenome into global datasets that represent a diverse array of "omics" data (transcriptional, epigenetic, proteomic, metabolomic). The methods used to collect these data consist of high-throughput data generation platforms that include high-content screening, imaging, flow cytometry, mass spectrometry, and nucleic acid sequencing. Of these, the next-generation DNA sequencing platforms predominate because they provide an inexpensive and scalable way to quickly interrogate the molecular changes at the genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptional level. Furthermore, existing and developing single-molecule sequencing platforms will likely make direct RNA and protein measurements possible, thus increasing the specificity of current assays and making it possible to better characterize "epi-alterations" that occur in the epigenome and epitranscriptome. These diverse data types present us with the largest challenge: how do we develop software systems and algorithms that can integrate these datasets and begin to support a more democratic model where individuals can capture and track their own medical information through biometric devices and personal genome sequencing? Such systems will need to provide the necessary user interactions to work with the trillions of data points needed to make scientific discoveries. Here, we describe novel approaches in the genesis and processing of such data, models to integrate these data, and the increasing ubiquity of self-reporting and self-measured genomics and health data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Pakistan 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 29%
Researcher 13 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Computer Science 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,933,036
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,104
of 4,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,042
of 305,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#39
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.