You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
An Asymmetric Fingerprinting Scheme Based on Tardos Codes
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 4 |
| Book title |
Information Hiding
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-24178-9_4 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-224177-2, 978-3-64-224178-9
|
| Authors |
Ana Charpentier, Caroline Fontaine, Teddy Furon, Ingemar Cox, Charpentier, Ana, Fontaine, Caroline, Furon, Teddy, Cox, Ingemar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 8 | 57% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 14% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,211,224
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#989
of 8,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,383
of 112,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.