↓ Skip to main content

Subcellular Biochemistry

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 17: Ascorbic acid and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Ascorbic acid and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Chapter number 17
Book title
Subcellular Biochemistry
Published in
Sub cellular biochemistry, January 1996
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-0325-1_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4613-7998-0, 978-1-4613-0325-1
Authors

S M Lynch, J M Gaziano, B Frei, Sean M. Lynch, J. Michael Gaziano, Balz Frei, Lynch, Sean M., Gaziano, J. Michael, Frei, Balz

Abstract

In this chapter, we have briefly reviewed the current scientific knowledge of the role of vitamin C in the prevention of atherosclerosis and its associated clinical manifestations. There is good evidence from animal studies that vitamin C can slow the progression of experimental atherosclerosis. Most of these studies, however, were done either in guinea pigs, using ascorbic acid depletion, or in cholesterol-fed rabbits, using ascorbic acid supplementation. Both animal models have limitations, as guinea pigs are not a well-established (nor well-studied) model of atherosclerosis, and rabbits develop atherosclerosis at high serum beta-VLDL cholesterol levels, and in addition can synthesize ascorbic acid. In contrast, humans develop atherosclerosis spontaneously and readily at moderately elevated serum LDL cholesterol levels and have lost the ability to synthesize ascorbic acid. Thus, the animal studies discussed, although quite promising and suggestive of an anti-atherogenic effect of ascorbic acid, need to be expanded to primates before more definitive conclusions can be drawn. Similar to the animal data, the current evidence from epidemiological studies on the role of vitamin C in the prevention of CVD is inconclusive, with some studies showing a very strong correlation between increased vitamin C intake and incidence of CVD events and other studies showing no correlation at all. Studies on CVD risk factors indicate that vitamin C may moderately decrease total serum cholesterol levels, increase HDL levels, and exert a hypotensive effect. These findings are particularly intriguing and should be pursued vigorously in basic research studies to elucidate biological mechanisms. In addition, it appears that large placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trials of vitamin C supplementation (without simultaneous supplementation with vitamin E) in populations with a wide range of vitamin C body levels are needed in order to confirm or refute a role for vitamin C in the prevention of CVD. Unfortunately, no such trials are currently being conducted. The possible mechanisms by which ascorbic acid may affect the development of atherosclerosis and the onset of acute coronary events include effects on arterial wall integrity related to biosynthesis of collagen and GAGs, altered cholesterol metabolism mediated by vitamin C-dependent conversion of cholesterol to bile acids, and effects on triglyceride levels via modulation of lipoprotein lipase activity. A particularly intriguing possible mechanism for the anti-atherogenic effect of vitamin C is prevention of atherogenic, oxidative modification of LDL. Numerous in vitro studies have demonstrated that ascorbic acid strongly inhibits LDL oxidation by a variety of mechanisms. The potential effects of ascorbic acid on platelet function and EDRF metabolism are particularly intriguing, as they might have widespread consequences for the prevention of atherosclerotic lesion development as well as acute clinical events. Thus, both metabolic and antioxidant functions may contribute to the possible reduction of CVD risk by vitamin C.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 30%
Other 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Psychology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,673,762
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from Sub cellular biochemistry
#79
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,146
of 82,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sub cellular biochemistry
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.