You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Utilization of DBpedia Mapping in Cross Lingual Wikipedia Infobox Completion
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 25 |
Book title |
AI 2016: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-50127-7_25 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-950126-0, 978-3-31-950127-7
|
Authors |
Megawati, Saemi Jang, Mun Yong Yi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Spain | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Ecuador | 1 | 14% |
Germany | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,260,405
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,046
of 8,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,591
of 417,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#93
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.