↓ Skip to main content

Bioinformatics Research and Applications

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Bioinformatics Research and Applications'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 An Efficient Algorithm for Finding All Pairs k-Mismatch Maximal Common Substrings
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Poisson-Markov Mixture Model and Parallel Algorithm for Binning Massive and Heterogenous DNA Sequencing Reads
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 FSG: Fast String Graph Construction for De Novo Assembly of Reads Data
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 OVarCall: Bayesian Mutation Calling Method Utilizing Overlapping Paired-End Reads
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 High-Performance Sensing of DNA Hybridization on Surface of Self-organized MWCNT-Arrays Decorated by Organometallic Complexes
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Towards a More Accurate Error Model for BioNano Optical Maps
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 HapIso: An Accurate Method for the Haplotype-Specific Isoforms Reconstruction from Long Single-Molecule Reads
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Genome-Wide Structural Modeling of Protein-Protein Interactions
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Identifying Essential Proteins by Purifying Protein Interaction Networks
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Differential Functional Analysis and Change Motifs in Gene Networks to Explore the Role of Anti-sense Transcription
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Predicting MicroRNA-Disease Associations by Random Walking on Multiple Networks
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Progression Reconstruction from Unsynchronized Biological Data using Cluster Spanning Trees
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Consistent Visualization of Multiple Rigid Domain Decompositions of Proteins
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Multiagent Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction Tool for Novices and Experts
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Filling a Protein Scaffold with a Reference
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Mean Values of Gene Duplication and Loss Cost Functions
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 The SCJ Small Parsimony Problem for Weighted Gene Adjacencies
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Path-Difference Median Trees
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 NEMo: An Evolutionary Model with Modularity for PPI Networks
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Multi-genome Scaffold Co-assembly Based on the Analysis of Gene Orders and Genomic Repeats
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Selectoscope: A Modern Web-App for Positive Selection Analysis of Genomic Data
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Methods for Genome-Wide Analysis of MDR and XDR Tuberculosis from Belarus
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Haplotype Inference for Pedigrees with Few Recombinations
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Improved Detection of 2D Gel Electrophoresis Spots by Using Gaussian Mixture Model
Attention for Chapter 6: Towards a More Accurate Error Model for BioNano Optical Maps
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Towards a More Accurate Error Model for BioNano Optical Maps
Chapter number 6
Book title
Bioinformatics Research and Applications
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-38782-6_6
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-938781-9, 978-3-31-938782-6
Authors

Menglu Li, Angel C. Y. Mak, Ernest T. Lam, Pui-Yan Kwok, Ming Xiao, Kevin Y. Yip, Ting-Fung Chan, Siu-Ming Yiu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 5 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Other 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 36%
Psychology 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,341,817
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,325
of 8,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,984
of 338,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#138
of 305 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 305 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.