↓ Skip to main content

T Lymphocytes as Tools in Diagnostics and Immunotoxicology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Tools and Methods for Identification and Analysis of Rare Antigen-Specific T Lymphocytes.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Tools and Methods for Identification and Analysis of Rare Antigen-Specific T Lymphocytes.
Chapter number 6
Book title
T Lymphocytes as Tools in Diagnostics and Immunotoxicology
Published in
EXS, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-0348-0726-5_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-480725-8, 978-3-03-480726-5
Authors

Stefan F Martin, Sonja S Schmucker, Anne Richter, Stefan F. Martin, Sonja S. Schmucker, Martin, Stefan F., Schmucker, Sonja S., Richter, Anne

Abstract

T lymphocytes are essential as effector and memory cells for immune defense against infections and as regulatory T cells in the establishment and maintenance of immune tolerance. However, they are also involved in immune pathology being effectors in autoimmune and allergic diseases or suppressors of immunity in cancer, and they often cause problems in transplantation. Therefore, strategies are being developed that allow the in vivo amplification or isolation, in vitro expansion and genetic manipulation of beneficial T cells for adoptive cell therapies or for the tolerization, or elimination of pathogenic T cells. The major goal is to make use of the exquisite antigen specificity of T cells to develop targeted strategies and to develop techniques that allow for the identification and depletion or enrichment of very often rare antigen-specific naïve as well as effector and memory T cells. Such techniques are very useful for immune monitoring of T cell responses in diagnostics and vaccination and for the development of T cell-based assays for the replacement of animal testing in immunotoxicology to identify contact allergens and drugs that cause adverse reactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Other 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 15%
Computer Science 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,284,663
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from EXS
#59
of 93 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,931
of 305,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EXS
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.