↓ Skip to main content

Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Transgenic animal models in biomedical research.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Transgenic animal models in biomedical research.
Book title
Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2007
DOI 10.1385/1-59745-165-7:163
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-656-6, 978-1-59745-165-9
Authors

Louis-Marie Houdebine, Houdebine, Louis-Marie

Abstract

Transgenic animals have become a key tool in functional genomics to generate models for human diseases and validate new drugs. Transgenesis includes the addition of foreign genetic information to animals and specific inhibition of endogenous gene expression. Recently, animal models provided novel insight and significantly improved our understanding of the initiation and perpetuation of human diseases. Moreover, they are an invaluable tool for target discovery, validation, and production of therapeutic proteins. However, despite the generation of several transgenic and knockout models, obtaining relevant models still faces several theoretical and technical challenges. Indeed, genes of interest are not always available and gene addition or inactivation sometimes does not allow clear conclusions because of the intrinsic complexity of living organisms or the redundancy of some metabolic pathways. In addition to homologous recombination, endogenous gene expression can be specifically inhibited using several mechanisms such as RNA interference. Here, some animal models are described to illustrate their importance in biomedical research. Moreover, guidelines for generation of these animals are presented.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 115 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 36 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 41 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,105,291
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#289
of 14,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,478
of 168,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#6
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.