You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
“Are Machines Better Than Humans in Image Tagging?” - A User Study Adds to the Puzzle
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 15 |
Book title |
Advances in Information Retrieval
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-56608-5_15 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-956607-8, 978-3-31-956608-5
|
Authors |
Ralph Ewerth, Matthias Springstein, Lo An Phan-Vogtmann, Juliane Schütze, Ralph Ewerth, Matthias Springstein, Lo An Phan-Vogtmann, Juliane Schütze, Ewerth, Ralph, Springstein, Matthias, Phan-Vogtmann, Lo An, Schütze, Juliane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 27% |
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 10 | 67% |
Engineering | 2 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,269,329
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,121
of 8,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,221
of 325,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#16
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.