↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Heat Shock Proteins in Reproductive System Development and Function

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Heat Shock Proteins and Maternal Contribution to Oogenesis and Early Embryogenesis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Heat Shock Proteins and Maternal Contribution to Oogenesis and Early Embryogenesis
Chapter number 1
Book title
The Role of Heat Shock Proteins in Reproductive System Development and Function
Published in
Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51409-3_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-951408-6, 978-3-31-951409-3
Authors

Christians, Elisabeth S., Elisabeth S. Christians

Abstract

Early embryos develop from fertilized eggs using materials that are stored during oocyte growth and which can be defined as maternal contribution (molecules, factors, or determinants). Several heat shock proteins (HSPs) and the heat shock transcriptional factor (HSF) are part of the maternal contribution that is critical for successful embryogenesis and reproduction. A maternal role for heat shock-related genes was mainly demonstrated in genetic experimental organisms (e.g., fly, nematode, mouse). Nowadays, an increasing number of "omics" data are produced from a large panel of organisms implementing a catalog of maternal and/or embryonic HSPs and HSFs. However, for most of them, it remains to better understand their potential roles in this context. Existing and future genome-wide screens mainly set up to create loss-of-function are likely to improve this situation. This chapter will discuss available data from various experimental organisms following the developmental steps from egg production to early embryogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,453,139
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#37
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,475
of 309,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in anatomy embryology and cell biology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.