↓ Skip to main content

The Wistar rat as a right choice: Establishing mammalian standards and the ideal of a standardized mammal

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the History of Biology, June 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Wistar rat as a right choice: Establishing mammalian standards and the ideal of a standardized mammal
Published in
Journal of the History of Biology, June 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf01061973
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bonnie Tocher Clause

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 162 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 61 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 13%
Arts and Humanities 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 63 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Biology
#191
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,829
of 19,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Biology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.