↓ Skip to main content

Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Ad Hominem Fallacies and Epistemic Credibility
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Ad Hominem Fallacies and Epistemic Credibility
Chapter number 2
Book title
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation
Published in
Law and Philosophy Library, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8_2
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-916147-1, 978-3-31-916148-8
Authors

Audrey Yap

Editors

Thomas Bustamante, Christian Dahlman

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%