↓ Skip to main content

Organ Regeneration

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Organ Regeneration'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Generation of Various Telencephalic Regions from Human Embryonic Stem Cells in Three-Dimensional Culture
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Generation of a Three-Dimensional Retinal Tissue from Self-Organizing Human ESC Culture
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 3D Culture for Self-Formation of the Cerebellum from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Through Induction of the Isthmic Organizer
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Reconstitution of a Patterned Neural Tube from Single Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Functional Pituitary Tissue Formation
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Directed Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Into Inner Ear Sensory Epithelia in 3D Culture
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Generation of Functional Thyroid Tissue Using 3D-Based Culture of Embryonic Stem Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Functional Tooth Regeneration
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Functional Hair Follicle Regeneration by the Rearrangement of Stem Cells
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Functional Salivary Gland Regeneration
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Generation of a Bioengineered Lacrimal Gland by Using the Organ Germ Method
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Generation of Gastrointestinal Organoids from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Generation of a Three-Dimensional Kidney Structure from Pluripotent Stem Cells
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Making a Kidney Organoid Using the Directed Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Liver Regeneration Using Cultured Liver Bud
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Formation of Stomach Tissue by Organoid Culture Using Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 In Vivo Model of Small Intestine
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Erratum to: In Vivo Model of Small Intestine
Attention for Chapter 13: Generation of a Three-Dimensional Kidney Structure from Pluripotent Stem Cells
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Generation of a Three-Dimensional Kidney Structure from Pluripotent Stem Cells
Chapter number 13
Book title
Organ Regeneration
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6949-4_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6947-0, 978-1-4939-6949-4, 978-1-4939-6947-0, 978-1-4939-6949-4
Authors

Yoshimura, Yasuhiro, Taguchi, Atsuhiro, Nishinakamura, Ryuichi, Yasuhiro Yoshimura, Atsuhiro Taguchi, Ryuichi Nishinakamura

Editors

Takashi Tsuji

Abstract

The kidney is a vital organ that has an important role in the maintenance of homeostasis by fluid volume regulation and waste product excretion. This role cannot be performed without the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the kidney. Therefore, it is important to generate the 3D structure of the kidney when inducing functional kidney tissue or the whole organ from pluripotent stem cells. In this chapter, we describe the detailed methods to induce kidney progenitor cells from pluripotent stem cells, which are based on embryological development. We also provide a method to generate 3D kidney tissue with vascularized glomeruli upon transplantation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,656,504
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#903
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,988
of 309,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#15
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.