You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
ω-Automata
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 1 |
Book title |
Automata Logics, and Infinite Games
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, November 2002
|
DOI | 10.1007/3-540-36387-4_1 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-000388-5, 978-3-54-036387-3
|
Authors |
Berndt Farwer, Farwer, Berndt |
Editors |
Erich Grädel, Wolfgang Thomas, Thomas Wilke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 38% |
Researcher | 3 | 23% |
Professor | 2 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 8 | 62% |
Mathematics | 1 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,714,942
of 23,462,326 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,494
of 8,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,000
of 130,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#45
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,462,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.