↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)—Part 1

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
305 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)—Part 1
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Bittner, J. Bingener-Casey, U. Dietz, M. Fabian, G. S. Ferzli, R. H. Fortelny, F. Köckerling, J. Kukleta, K. LeBlanc, D. Lomanto, M. C. Misra, V. K. Bansal, S. Morales-Conde, B. Ramshaw, W. Reinpold, S. Rim, M. Rohr, R. Schrittwieser, Th. Simon, M. Smietanski, B. Stechemesser, M. Timoney, P. Chowbey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 284 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 15%
Other 38 13%
Student > Master 31 11%
Student > Postgraduate 27 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Other 77 26%
Unknown 54 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 182 62%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 68 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,887,406
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#323
of 7,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,949
of 227,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#4
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.