↓ Skip to main content

Hepatitis C Virus: From Molecular Virology to Antiviral Therapy

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: Hepatitis C virus-specific directly acting antiviral drugs.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hepatitis C virus-specific directly acting antiviral drugs.
Chapter number 12
Book title
Hepatitis C Virus: From Molecular Virology to Antiviral Therapy
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-27340-7_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-227339-1, 978-3-64-227340-7
Authors

Delang L, Neyts J, Vliegen I, Abrignani S, Neddermann P, De Francesco R, Leen Delang, Johan Neyts, Inge Vliegen, Sergio Abrignani, Petra Neddermann, Raffaele De Francesco

Abstract

The major targets for direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are the NS3/4A protease, the NS5A protein, and the NS5B polymerase. The latter enzyme offers several target sites: the catalytic domain for nucleoside/nucleotide analogs and different allosteric sites for non-nucleoside inhibitors. Two protease inhibitors have already been approved and more than 40 new NS3/4A, NS5A, or NS5B inhibitors are in development pipeline. Not only these agents can achieve very high cure rates when combined with PEG-IFN and RBV, but have also started to provide promising results when combined in IFN-free, all-oral combinations. In addition to the more canonical drug targets, new alternative viral targets for small molecule drug development are emerging, such as p7 or NS4B. Current research is focusing on defining the most efficacious DAA combination regimens, i.e., those which provide the highest rates of viral eradication, broadest spectrum of action, minimal or no clinical resistance, shortest treatment duration, and good tolerability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
France 1 3%
Saudi Arabia 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,279,577
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#447
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,799
of 195,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.