↓ Skip to main content

Mammalian Cell Cultures for Biologics Manufacturing

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 255: Mammalian Cell Cultures for Biologics Manufacturing.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 220)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Mammalian Cell Cultures for Biologics Manufacturing.
Chapter number 255
Book title
Mammalian Cell Cultures for Biologics Manufacturing
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/10_2013_255
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-254049-3, 978-3-64-254050-9
Authors

Kantardjieff A, Zhou W, Anne Kantardjieff, Weichang Zhou, Kantardjieff, Anne, Zhou, Weichang

Abstract

Biopharmaceuticals represent a growing sector of the pharmaceutical industry, and are used for a wide range of indications, including oncology and rheumatology. Cultured mammalian cells have become the predominant expression system for their production, partly due to their ability to complete the posttranslational modifications required for drug safety and efficacy. Over the past decade, the productivity of mammalian cell culture production processes has growth dramatically through improvements in both volumetric and specific productivities. This article presents an overview of the biologics market, including analysis of sales and approvals; as well as a review of industrial production cell lines and cell culture operations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 217 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 20%
Student > Master 43 19%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Other 9 4%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 62 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 17%
Engineering 28 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Chemical Engineering 9 4%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 62 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,071,260
of 24,001,212 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#7
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,899
of 310,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,001,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.