↓ Skip to main content

Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 High Impact Design Requirements - Key Design Challenges for the Next Decade
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Current and Future Research Directions in Requirements Engineering
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Requirements in the 21st Century: Current Practice and Emerging Trends
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Section 1: Fundamental Concepts of Design
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Evolution of Design Requirements in the Trajectory of Artificiality: A Research Agenda
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Proposal for a Formal Definition of the Design Concept
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Incomplete by Design and Designing for Incompleteness
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Challenges in Requirements Engineering: A Research Agenda for Conceptual Modeling
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Section 2: Evolution and the Fluidity of Design
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 On the Inevitable Intertwining of Requirements and Architecture
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Requirements Evolution and What (Research) to Do about It
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Designs Can Talk: A Case of Feedback for Design Evolution in Assistive Technology
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Section 3: Quality and Value-Based Requirements
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Impact of Requirements Quality on Project Success or Failure
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Designing Value-Based Inter-organizational Controls Using Patterns
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Section 4: Requirements Intertwining
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Exploring the Fitness Relationship between System Functionality and Business Needs
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 A Framework for Business Process Change Requirements Analysis
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 The Intertwining of Enterprise Strategy and Requirements
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Managing Legal Texts in Requirements Engineering
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Requirements’ Role in Mobilizing and Enabling Design Conversation
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Design Requirements for Communication-Intensive Interactive Applications
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Requirements Engineering and Aspects
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Section 5: Adapting Requirements Practices in Different Domains
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 On Technology Convergence and Platforms: Requirements Challenges from New Technologies and System Architectures
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Understanding Requirements for Open Source Software
Attention for Chapter 14: Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective
Chapter number 14
Book title
Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective
Published in
ADS, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-92966-6_14
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-092965-9, 978-3-54-092966-6
Authors

Alexander Egyed, Paul Grünbacher, Matthias Heindl, Stefan Biffl, Egyed, Alexander, Grünbacher, Paul, Heindl, Matthias, Biffl, Stefan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 62 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 44 66%
Engineering 7 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,394,617
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#8,080
of 37,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,367
of 168,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#246
of 896 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 896 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.