↓ Skip to main content

Dictyostelium discoideum Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Optimized fixation and immunofluorescence staining methods for Dictyostelium cells.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Optimized fixation and immunofluorescence staining methods for Dictyostelium cells.
Book title
Dictyostelium discoideum Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2005
DOI 10.1385/1-59745-144-4:327
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-623-8, 978-1-59745-144-4
Authors

Hagedorn M, Neuhaus EM, Soldati T, Monica Hagedorn, Eva M. Neuhaus, Thierry Soldati

Abstract

Recent years have seen a powerful revival of fluorescence microscopy techniques, both to observe live cells and fixed objects. The limits of sensitivity, simultaneous detection of multiple chromophores, and spatial resolution have all been pushed to the extreme. Therefore, it is essential to improve in parallel the quality of the structural and antigenic preservation during fixation and immunostaining. Chemical fixations are broadly used but often lead to antigenicity loss and severe membrane damages, such as organelle vesiculation. They also must be followed by membrane permeabilization by detergents or solvents, which can lead to extensive extraction and cytosol leakage. Fixation with solvents bypasses the need for permeabilization, but when carried out at "high" temperatures, leads to severe extraction of soluble proteins and lipids and cytosol wash-out, and has therefore been used routinely to visualize the cytoskeleton. Here, we describe a few modifications to the common aldehyde fixation protocol that help decrease the usual artifacts induced by chemical fixation. Alternatively, new techniques have now been established that are based on rapid freezing using a variety of coolants followed by fixation in solvents at low temperature. We present detailed protocols and notes that allow the achievement of optimal preservation and permeabilization for both light and electron microscopy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 76 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 22%
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#18,343,746
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,853
of 13,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,575
of 153,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.