You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Large Scale Image Retrieval with Practical Spatial Weighting for Bag-of-Visual-Words
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 47 |
Book title |
Advances in Multimedia Modeling
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-35725-1_47 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-235724-4, 978-3-64-235725-1
|
Authors |
Fangyuan Wang, Hai Wang, Heping Li, Shuwu Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 1 | 50% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,196,270
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#6,981
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,772
of 280,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#288
of 314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.