↓ Skip to main content

Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Urban Bird Research in a Global Perspective
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Global Patterns and Drivers of Urban Bird Diversity
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Urbanization and Bird Communities: Spatial and Temporal Patterns Emerging from Southern South America
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Bird Diversities and Their Responses to Urbanization in China
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Why Are Exotic Birds So Successful in Urbanized Environments?
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Becoming Citizens: Avian Adaptations to Urban Life
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Mechanisms of Behavioural Change in Urban Animals: The Role of Microevolution and Phenotypic Plasticity
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 The Role of Landscape-Scale Factors in Shaping Urban Bird Communities
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Trends in Long-Term Urban Bird Research
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Counting Birds in Urban Areas: A Review of Methods for the Estimation of Abundance
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Urban Ornithological Atlases in Europe: A Review
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Pollutants in Urbanized Areas: Direct and Indirect Effects on Bird Populations
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Ecological Effects of Light Pollution: How Can We Improve Our Understanding Using Light Loggers on Individual Animals?
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Human Initiation of Synurbic Populations of Waterfowl, Raptors, Pigeons and Cage Birds
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Bird Diversity Improves the Well-Being of City Residents
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Grassland to Urban Forest in 150 Years: Avifaunal Response in an African Metropolis
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Ecology and Conservation of Australian Urban and Exurban Avifauna
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Ecological and Social Factors Determining the Diversity of Birds in Residential Yards and Gardens
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Birds on Urban Wastelands
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 The Role of Invasive Plant Species in Urban Avian Conservation
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Species Richness and Species of Conservation Concern in Parks of Italian Towns
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Indicators of the Effects of the Urban Greening on Birds: The Case of Barcelona
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Management of Urban Nature and Its Impact on Bird Ecosystem Services
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Improving Research Towards Conservation Objectives
Attention for Chapter 18: Ecological and Social Factors Determining the Diversity of Birds in Residential Yards and Gardens
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Ecological and Social Factors Determining the Diversity of Birds in Residential Yards and Gardens
Chapter number 18
Book title
Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments
Published by
Springer International Publishing, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1_18
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-943312-7, 978-3-31-943314-1
Authors

Mark A. Goddard, Karen Ikin, Susannah B. Lerman, Goddard, Mark A., Ikin, Karen, Lerman, Susannah B.

Editors

Enrique Murgui, Marcus Hedblom

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 42%
Environmental Science 10 26%
Mathematics 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,442,415
of 22,080,859 outputs
Outputs from this source
#211
of 1,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,229
of 448,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#19
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,080,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.