↓ Skip to main content

DNA Barcoding

Overview of attention for book
DNA Barcoding
Springer US
Attention for Chapter: Scalable, Cost-Effective, and Decentralized DNA Barcoding with Oxford Nanopore Sequencing.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Scalable, Cost-Effective, and Decentralized DNA Barcoding with Oxford Nanopore Sequencing.
Book title
DNA Barcoding
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2024
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3581-0_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163580-3, 978-1-07-163581-0
Authors

Srivathsan, Amrita, Meier, Rudolf

Abstract

DNA barcodes are useful in biodiversity research, but sequencing barcodes with dye termination methods ("Sanger sequencing") has been so time-consuming and expensive that DNA barcodes are not as widely used as they should be. Fortunately, MinION sequencers from Oxford Nanopore Technologies have recently emerged as a cost-effective and efficient alternative for barcoding. MinION barcodes are now suitable for large-scale species discovery and enable specimen identification when the target species are represented in barcode databases. With a MinION, it is possible to obtain 10,000 barcodes from a single flow cell at a cost of less than 0.10 USD per specimen. Additionally, a Flongle flow cell can be used for small projects requiring up to 300 barcodes (0.50 USD per specimen). We here describe a cost-effective laboratory workflow for obtaining tagged amplicons, preparing ONT libraries, sequencing amplicon pools, and analyzing the MinION reads with the software ONTbarcoder. This workflow has been shown to yield highly accurate barcodes that are 99.99% identical to Sanger barcodes. Overall, we propose that the use of MinION for DNA barcoding is an attractive option for all researchers in need of a cost-effective and efficient solution for large-scale species discovery and specimen identification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,053,038
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,454
of 14,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,364
of 358,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#98
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,385 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.